Someone asked us to comment in any blog post on the much-discussed and well-known poems of political satire, which run for days in the country! As we stated in the presentation of the blog, this tool aims to be a democratic space of confrontation, where everyone can express their ideas!
Someone always in a comment, wrote poetry, even poetry (I see that the poetic dialect is very popular and satirical) urging them not to eliminate them. We do not we do and we hope that the aim is really what the anonymous exposed!
Personally I think these should be read rhyming slang really satirical sense and not as an injury. To this end I would like to recall the definition of "satire" and its ancient origins.
Satire (Latin saturated Lanx, name of a dish and mixed color) is a form of absolute freedom and theater, a genre of literature, arts and other critics characterized by attention to social life, with the intention of highlight the paradoxical aspects and ethical mock the absurdities and contradictions. The origins of satire in European literature is obviously confused with those of comic literature, the beginning of which is traditionally attributed to Homer's poem with Margie. The Greek comedy of Aristophanes' political satire is a key ingredient. But the real coding as a literary genre, which is also the result of a parallel evolution Italic, occurs in Latin literature. The satire is born between the third and second century BC by Ennio, and can be considered the first kind of original Latin literature, unlike all the others who were of Greek origin.
Satire historically and culturally responds to a need of the human spirit: the oscillation between the sacred and the profane. The satire is always involved in discussions, mainly politics, religion, sex and death, and offers views on these alternative, and through laughter conveys small truth, sowing doubts, exposes hypocrisies, prejudices and attacks calls into question beliefs. It is expressed in a common area of \u200b\u200b"borderline", it generally has an ethical content normally attributed to the author, but begs and gets generally shareability general, appealing to popular inclinations, and for this they are often the subject of privileged characters public life in positions of power.
These same characteristics have been highlighted by the First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court that the 9246 ruling of 2006, he felt compelled to give a legal definition of what constitutes for satire
" is the manifestation of thought at times of very high level in the time he took on the task of 'punish laughing mores' , or to indicate the public about questionable or reprehensible aspects of people, in order to obtain caused by the rice, a final outcome of the ethical, that is, towards the good corrective. "
Satire historically and culturally responds to a need of the human spirit: the oscillation between the sacred and the profane. The satire is always involved in discussions, mainly politics, religion, sex and death, and offers views on these alternative, and through laughter conveys small truth, sowing doubts, exposes hypocrisies, prejudices and attacks calls into question beliefs. It is expressed in a common area of \u200b\u200b"borderline", it generally has an ethical content normally attributed to the author, but begs and gets generally shareability general, appealing to popular inclinations, and for this they are often the subject of privileged characters public life in positions of power.
These same characteristics have been highlighted by the First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court that the 9246 ruling of 2006, he felt compelled to give a legal definition of what constitutes for satire
" is the manifestation of thought at times of very high level in the time he took on the task of 'punish laughing mores' , or to indicate the public about questionable or reprehensible aspects of people, in order to obtain caused by the rice, a final outcome of the ethical, that is, towards the good corrective. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment