The idea that led us a few days ago to start this blog was to allow everyone to share their ideas confronting others, and especially with those who think differently! The objective was to arouse interest in everyone and love for their country, so that the latter through the ideological and cultural growth of its individual components, could be projected in a better tomorrow. The country grows only grow if its members! The essential premise, however, must be a healthy dialogue that will fall into the baseness of insults and personal hatreds. Someone rightly commented utters this legitimate observation in the light of comments made recently "canonical" that you have and which certainly clouded the principle ispiratorio.
I was forced, therefore, to remove certain comments which offended some people directly and henceforth follow this method because it is not through insults that will improve!
PS carry information purposes as expressed by the court in Aosta on the responsibilities of bloggers.
criminal responsibility. is always a "personal", so everyone is personally responsible for what he writes. Even if the blog is the collective response of a single author's own writings, not the Web community to which it belongs. No need to specify it in proper legal notice. This also applies to comments made by third parties, even though processed anonymously because the Criminal responsibility is, in fact, personal and can not be directly pursued the owner of a blog to a comment posted by a visitor: the Postal Police can trace the sender by means of (complex) investigations. The owner of the blog where the comment will be added, if anything, in charge of negligence for failing to control or removal of the comment (but this aspect see below).
liability for negligence. In the case of collective post on blogs or comments that infringe rights of third parties or image and dignity, the blog owner is not personally responsible for the script / detrimental to comment as we said in the previous paragraph but it can be judged by the lack of control (negligence) and / or failure to remove this text. For example, if a blogger you find a comment offensive (against anyone) on their web sites, is required to remove it promptly to limit the damage of others. In that sense, and not for the specific criminal responsibility of writing offensive may be initiated legal action against the owner of the weblog.
0 comments:
Post a Comment